Craiton v. State

Supreme Court of Georgia

Craiton v. State

199 Ga. 829

CourtSupreme Court of Georgia

DecidedOctober 5, 1945

DocketNo. 15273

StatusPublished

This text of 199 Ga. 829 (Craiton v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Craiton v. State, 199 Ga. 829 (Ga. 1945).

Pincite

Opinion

Jenkins, Presiding Justice.

The evidence authorized the jury to find the defendant guilty of murder; and, since the only exceptions consist of the general grounds, the judgment denying the motion for new trial is affirmed.

Judgment affirmed.

All the Justices concur, except Head, J., disqualified. Robert T. Speer, for plaintiff in error. J. Eugene Cooh, attorney-general, E. E. Andrews, solicitor-general, Durwood T. Pye and Claude Shaw, assistant attorney-general, contra.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Jenkins, Presiding Justice.

The evidence authorized the jury to find the defendant guilty of murder; and, since the only exceptions consist of the general grounds, the judgment denying the motion for new trial is affirmed.

Judgment affirmed.

All the Justices concur, except Head, J., disqualified. Robert T. Speer, for plaintiff in error. J. Eugene Cooh, attorney-general, E. E. Andrews, solicitor-general, Durwood T. Pye and Claude Shaw, assistant attorney-general, contra.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

199 Ga. 829, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/craiton-v-state-ga-1945.