Crain v. State
579 So. 2d 411, 1991 Fla. App. LEXIS 5774, 1991 WL 85563
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided May 24, 1991·No. No. 91-01292·Published·Cited by 1 cases
Opinion
We affirm the trial court’s denial of appellant’s motion to correct sentence. To the extent appellant alleges he is being denied gain time in violation of Waldrup v. Dugger, 562 So.2d 687 (Fla.1990), our decision is without prejudice to appellant filing a petition for writ of mandamus in the circuit court in and for the county where he is presently confined. See Hall v. Wainwright, 498 So.2d 670 (Fla. 1st DCA 1986).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Crain v. State, 579 So. 2d 411, 1991 Fla. App. LEXIS 5774, 1991 WL 85563 (Fla. Ct. App. 1991).
579 So. 2d 411 (Crain v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Hamby v. State
619 So. 2d 972 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1993)