Crain v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Crain v. State

579 So. 2d 411, 1991 Fla. App. LEXIS 5774, 1991 WL 85563

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedMay 24, 1991

DocketNo. 91-01292

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 579 So. 2d 411 (Crain v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Crain v. State, 579 So. 2d 411, 1991 Fla. App. LEXIS 5774, 1991 WL 85563 (Fla. Ct. App. 1991).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We affirm the trial court’s denial of appellant’s motion to correct sentence. To the extent appellant alleges he is being denied gain time in violation of Waldrup v. Dugger, 562 So.2d 687 (Fla.1990), our decision is without prejudice to appellant filing a petition for writ of mandamus in the circuit court in and for the county where he is presently confined. See Hall v. Wainwright, 498 So.2d 670 (Fla. 1st DCA 1986).

CAMPBELL, A.C.J., and FRANK and PATTERSON, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

We affirm the trial court’s denial of appellant’s motion to correct sentence. To the extent appellant alleges he is being denied gain time in violation of Waldrup v. Dugger, 562 So.2d 687 (Fla.1990), our decision is without prejudice to appellant filing a petition for writ of mandamus in the circuit court in and for the county where he is presently confined. See Hall v. Wainwright, 498 So.2d 670 (Fla. 1st DCA 1986).

CAMPBELL, A.C.J., and FRANK and PATTERSON, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

579 So. 2d 411, 1991 Fla. App. LEXIS 5774, 1991 WL 85563, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/crain-v-state-fladistctapp-1991.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack