Craigmiles v. Craigmiles

Supreme Court of Georgia

Craigmiles v. Craigmiles

228 S.E.2d 882, 237 Ga. 498, 1976 Ga. LEXIS 1286

CourtSupreme Court of Georgia

DecidedSeptember 8, 1976

Docket31312

StatusPublished

Cited by15 cases

This text of 228 S.E.2d 882 (Craigmiles v. Craigmiles) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Craigmiles v. Craigmiles, 228 S.E.2d 882, 237 Ga. 498, 1976 Ga. LEXIS 1286 (Ga. 1976).

Pincite

Opinion

Hill, Justice.

Eleanor Craigmiles appeals from the grant of a divorce awarded her husband on the ground that the marriage was irretrievably broken. Although there is no transcript of the evidence adduced before the trial court, the final judgment includes the trial court’s findings of fact and conclusions of law.

Appellant’s enumerations of error are either contrary to the findings of fact or are unsupported by the record. Findings of fact will not be set aside unless clearly erroneous (Code Ann. § 81A-152 (a)), and the judgment of *499 the trial court will not be disturbed where the record does not show error. In the absence of a transcript of the evidence, we must assume the evidence presented was sufficient to support the judgment. Satterfield v. Satterfield, 236 Ga. 155 (1) (223 SE2d 136) (1976).

Submitted July 2, 1976 Decided September 8, 1976. Eleanor Craigmiles, pro se. Altman, Williamson, McGraw & Loftiss, JeffLoftiss, for appellee.

Judgment affirmed.

All the Justices concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI