Craig Vickery v. Ardagh Glass Inc. (mem. dec.)

Indiana Court of Appeals·Decided December 19, 2017·No. 49A02-1702-PL-330·Published

Opinion

MEMORANDUM DECISION ON REHEARING Pursuant to Ind. Appellate Rule 65(D), FILED this Memorandum Decision shall not be Dec 19 2017, 9:52 am regarded as precedent or cited before any CLERK court except for the purpose of Indiana Supreme Court Court of Appeals

establishing the defense of res judicata, and Tax Court

collateral estoppel, or the law of the case.

ATTORNEYS FOR APPELLANT ATTORNEYS FOR APPELLEE Kevin W. Betz Adam Arceneaux Sandra L. Blevins Derek R. Molter Benjamin C. Ellis Kaitlyn J. Marschke Betz + Blevins Ice Miller LLP Indianapolis, Indiana Indianapolis, Indiana

IN THE

COURT OF APPEALS OF INDIANA

Craig Vickery, December 19, 2017 Appellant-Defendant, Court of Appeals Case No.

49A02-1702-PL-330

v. Appeal from the Marion Superior Court, Indiana Commercial Court Ardagh Glass Inc., The Honorable Heather A. Welch, Appellee-Plaintiff Judge Trial Court Cause No. 49D01-1606-PL-23465

Baker, Judge.

Court of Appeals of Indiana | Mem. Dec. on Rehearing 49A02-1702-PL-330 | December 19, 2017 Page 1 of 2

[1] The appellant’s petition for rehearing contains a multitude of examples of the

following language:

• “This Opinion is grossly erroneous.” • “This Opinion . . . provides sua sponte the most deficient and defective due process waiver analysis in the history of Indiana jurisprudence . . . .” • “astonishing material inaccuracies and significant errors” • “in the entire history of Indiana jurisprudence, no opinion . . . has been so cursory or deficient in its legal analysis”

Pet’n for Reh. p. 6-7. The appellant claims to be “mindful of the limitations of

criticism for counsel[.]” Id. at p. 6 n.1. Apparently not. We encourage counsel

to use more respectful and measured language in the future and by separate

order deny the request for oral argument on rehearing.

[2] Our original decision stands, and in all other respects, we deny the petition for

rehearing.

Bailey, J., and Altice, J., concur.

Court of Appeals of Indiana | Mem. Dec. on Rehearing 49A02-1702-PL-330 | December 19, 2017 Page 2 of 2

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Craig Vickery v. Ardagh Glass Inc. (mem. dec.), (Ind. Ct. App. 2017).

Craig Vickery v. Ardagh Glass Inc. (mem. dec.) (Craig Vickery v. Ardagh Glass Inc. (mem. dec.)) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.