Craig v. W. & G. Du Cros

63 Misc. 524, 117 N.Y.S. 384
New York Supreme Court·Decided June 15, 1909·Published

Opinion

Giegerich, J.

The defendant moves for an order requiring the plaintiff, who is a non-resident, to give security for costs. The motion is opposed on the ground that the defendant is itself a non-resident, being a foreign corporation. The Code, however, has not limited the right to require such security to resident defendants (§ 3268), and this court has no power to impose such a limitation. The security provided by section 3268 belongs to a defendant as a matter [525] of right, and in nowise depends upon the discretion of the court. The language of the Court of Appeals, implying a distinction between resident and non-resident defendants and upon which the plaintiff relies (Banes v. Rainey, 192 N. Y. 286, 294), was used with reference to other portions of the Code of Civil Procedure, under which it is discretionary with the court to grant such security.

Motion granted, with ten dollars costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Craig v. W. & G. Du Cros, 63 Misc. 524, 117 N.Y.S. 384 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1909).

63 Misc. 524 (Craig v. W. & G. Du Cros) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Banes v. . Rainey
85 N.E. 71 (New York Court of Appeals, 1908)