Craig v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Craig v. State

117 S.W.2d 102, 135 Tex. Crim. 9, 1938 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 527

CourtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas

DecidedJune 1, 1938

DocketNo. 19800.

StatusPublished

This text of 117 S.W.2d 102 (Craig v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Craig v. State, 117 S.W.2d 102, 135 Tex. Crim. 9, 1938 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 527 (Tex. 1938).

Pincite

Opinion

*10 Krueger, Judge.

Appellant was convicted of having whisky in his possession which did not show that the tax due the State had been paid, and his punishment was assessed at a fine of $150.00 and confinement in the county jail for a period of sixty days.

It is noted that what purports to be a statement of facts accompanying the transcript does not bear the approval of the trial judge. Consequently the same can not be considered by this Court, and in the absence of a statement of facts appellant’s bills of exceptions can not be appraised.

The information seems to be sufficient to charge the offense of which the appellant was convicted. All other matters of form appearing regular, the judgment of the trial court is affirmed.

The foregoing opinion of the Commission of Appeals has been examined by the Judges of the Court of Criminal Appeals and approved by the Court.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

*10 Krueger, Judge.

Appellant was convicted of having whisky in his possession which did not show that the tax due the State had been paid, and his punishment was assessed at a fine of $150.00 and confinement in the county jail for a period of sixty days.

It is noted that what purports to be a statement of facts accompanying the transcript does not bear the approval of the trial judge. Consequently the same can not be considered by this Court, and in the absence of a statement of facts appellant’s bills of exceptions can not be appraised.

The information seems to be sufficient to charge the offense of which the appellant was convicted. All other matters of form appearing regular, the judgment of the trial court is affirmed.

The foregoing opinion of the Commission of Appeals has been examined by the Judges of the Court of Criminal Appeals and approved by the Court.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

117 S.W.2d 102, 135 Tex. Crim. 9, 1938 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 527, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/craig-v-state-texcrimapp-1938.