Craig v. State

72 S.W.2d 272, 126 Tex. Crim. 456, 1934 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 724
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Craig v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 130 Tex. Crim. 389
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas·Decided May 23, 1934·No. No. 16687.·Published

Opinions

CHRISTIAN, Judge. —

The offense is theft of cattle; the punishment, confinement in the penitentiary for two years.

Frank Brown v. The State, ^Opinion No. 16,688, this day delivered, is a companion case. The facts here are the same as those proven upon the trial of Frank Brown. In Brown’s Case we held that the trial court committed error in failing to charge on circumstantial evidence. In the present case appellant timely and properly excepted to the charge of the court for its failure to submit an instruction on the subject of circumstantial evidence. The failure of the court' to respond to the exception must work a reversal of the judgment.

The judgment is reversed and the cause remanded.

Reversed and remanded.

The foregoing opinion of the Commission of Appeals has been examined by the Judges of the Court of Criminal Appeals and approved by the Court.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Craig v. State, 72 S.W.2d 272, 126 Tex. Crim. 456, 1934 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 724 (Tex. 1934).

72 S.W.2d 272 (Craig v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.