Craig v. State

147 S.W. 229, 66 Tex. Crim. 433, 1912 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 289
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Craig v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 60 Tex. Crim. 195
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas·Decided May 8, 1912·No. No. 1761.·Published

Opinion

DAVIDSON, Presiding Judge.

Some days after the adjournment of court appellant executed a bond which is placed in the record as his recognizance or appeal bond. The Assistant Attorney-General moves to dismiss the appeal because, in the first place, the instrument is not a recognizance, and, in the second place, it was executed after the adjournment of court. The statute requires that the recognizance must be entered into in open court. The motion to dismiss is well taken, and the appeal is dismissed.

Dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Craig v. State, 147 S.W. 229, 66 Tex. Crim. 433, 1912 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 289 (Tex. 1912).

147 S.W. 229 (Craig v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.