Craig v. State

17 A. 1103, 50 N.J.L. 176, 1887 N.J. LEXIS 2
CourtSupreme Court of New Jersey
DecidedNovember 15, 1887
StatusPublished

This text of 17 A. 1103 (Craig v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Craig v. State, 17 A. 1103, 50 N.J.L. 176, 1887 N.J. LEXIS 2 (N.J. 1887).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The judgment in this ease should be affirmed, for the reasons given by the Supreme Court.

For affirmance — The Chancelloe, Chief Justice, Dixon, Reed, Van Syckel, Beown, Clement, Mc-Geeooe, Pateeson, Whitaker. 10. For reversal — None.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
17 A. 1103, 50 N.J.L. 176, 1887 N.J. LEXIS 2, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/craig-v-state-nj-1887.