Craig v. State

249 So. 3d 779

District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided July 11, 2018·No. No. 4D17–2087·Published

Opinion

Per Curiam.

We affirm in this Anders¹ appeal of the trial court's disposition of appellant's violation of probation proceeding, but remand for entry of a written order of revocation of probation specifying the conditions appellant was found to have violated. See Brown v. State , 82 So.3d 910 (Fla. 4th DCA 2011) ; Rey v. State , 904 So.2d 566 (Fla. 4th DCA 2005), Riley v. State , 884 So.2d 1038 (Fla. 4th DCA 2004).

Damoorgian, Levine and Klingensmith, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

We affirm in this Anders¹ appeal of the trial court's disposition of appellant's violation of probation proceeding, but remand for entry of a written order of revocation of probation specifying the conditions appellant was found to have violated. See Brown v. State , 82 So.3d 910 (Fla. 4th DCA 2011) ; Rey v. State , 904 So.2d 566 (Fla. 4th DCA 2005), Riley v. State , 884 So.2d 1038 (Fla. 4th DCA 2004).

Damoorgian, Levine and Klingensmith, JJ., concur.

Craig v. State, 249 So. 3d 779 (Fla. Ct. App. 2018).

Pincite

249 So. 3d 779 (Craig v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Anders v. California

386 U.S. 738 (Supreme Court, 1967)

884 So. 2d 1038 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2004)

904 So. 2d 566 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2005)

82 So. 3d 910 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2011)