Craig v. State

934 So. 2d 523, 2005 WL 3180596
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided November 30, 2005·No. 3D04-2305·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

934 So.2d 523 (2005)

Ronald Lee CRAIG, Appellant,
v.
The STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 3D04-2305.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

November 30, 2005.
Rehearing Denied May 4, 2006.

Ronald Lee Craig, in proper person.

Charles J. Crist, Jr., Attorney General, and Thomas C. Mielke, Assistant Attorney General, for appellee.

Before COPE, C.J., and FLETCHER and CORTIÑAS, JJ.

*524 PER CURIAM.

Ronald Lee Craig appeals an order denying his motion for postconviction relief under Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850. While the procedural history is somewhat complicated, the trial court conducted an evidentiary hearing on the defendant's Rule 3.850 claims and denied relief. Because the trial court's ruling is supported by competent substantial evidence, we affirm. See Blanco v. State, 702 So.2d 1250, 1252 (Fla.1997). We need not reach the State's alternative argument that the motion was time-barred.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Craig v. State, 934 So. 2d 523, 2005 WL 3180596 (Fla. Ct. App. 2005).

934 So. 2d 523 (Craig v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Craig v. State
45 So. 3d 1 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2010)
Mesa v. State
934 So. 2d 523 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2005)