Craig v. State
This text of 934 So. 2d 523 (Craig v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Ronald Lee CRAIG, Appellant,
v.
The STATE of Florida, Appellee.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
Ronald Lee Craig, in proper person.
Charles J. Crist, Jr., Attorney General, and Thomas C. Mielke, Assistant Attorney General, for appellee.
Before COPE, C.J., and FLETCHER and CORTIÑAS, JJ.
*524 PER CURIAM.
Ronald Lee Craig appeals an order denying his motion for postconviction relief under Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850. While the procedural history is somewhat complicated, the trial court conducted an evidentiary hearing on the defendant's Rule 3.850 claims and denied relief. Because the trial court's ruling is supported by competent substantial evidence, we affirm. See Blanco v. State, 702 So.2d 1250, 1252 (Fla.1997). We need not reach the State's alternative argument that the motion was time-barred.
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
934 So. 2d 523, 2005 WL 3180596, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/craig-v-state-fladistctapp-2005.