Craig v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Craig v. State

830 So. 2d 906, 2002 Fla. App. LEXIS 17165, 2002 WL 31556541

District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided November 20, 2002·No. No. 2D00-1417·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Essie Craig appeals her conviction for felony possession of marijuana and the probationary term imposed as a result of that conviction. She specifically challenges the denial of her dispositive motion to suppress. The evidence against Ms. Craig was seized from her home during the execution of the same search warrant involved in Randall v. State, 793 So.2d 59 (Fla. 2d DCA 2001), in which this court reversed the denial of Ms. Randall’s motion to suppress. Both Ms. Randall’s case and Ms. Craig’s case arose out of the same factual incident and the legal issues presented for consideration were identical. Accordingly, we reverse.

Reversed and remanded.

ALTENBERND,¹ CASANUEVA, and SALCINES, JJ., Concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Essie Craig appeals her conviction for felony possession of marijuana and the probationary term imposed as a result of that conviction. She specifically challenges the denial of her dispositive motion to suppress. The evidence against Ms. Craig was seized from her home during the execution of the same search warrant involved in Randall v. State, 793 So.2d 59 (Fla. 2d DCA 2001), in which this court reversed the denial of Ms. Randall’s motion to suppress. Both Ms. Randall’s case and Ms. Craig’s case arose out of the same factual incident and the legal issues presented for consideration were identical. Accordingly, we reverse.

Reversed and remanded.

ALTENBERND,¹ CASANUEVA, and SALCINES, JJ., Concur.

Craig v. State, 830 So. 2d 906, 2002 Fla. App. LEXIS 17165, 2002 WL 31556541 (Fla. Ct. App. 2002).

Pincite

830 So. 2d 906 (Craig v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related