Craig v. State

616 So. 2d 366, 1993 Ala. Crim. App. LEXIS 282, 1993 WL 85946
Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama·Decided March 26, 1993·No. CR-91-785·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

On Return to Remand

McMILLAN, Judge.

We remanded this cause, 616 So.2d 364, for the trial court to properly sentence the appellant on his conviction of robbery in the third degree. The trial court has now filed its return, which states that the appellant has been resentenced to 10 years' imprisonment, that sentence to run concurrently with the sentence imposed on his conviction of robbery in the first degree. Because the sentence is now within the range prescribed for a Class C felony conviction when the defendant has a single prior felony conviction, the judgment of the [367]*367trial court is due to be, and it is hereby, affirmed.

AFFIRMED.

All Judges concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Craig v. State, 616 So. 2d 366, 1993 Ala. Crim. App. LEXIS 282, 1993 WL 85946 (Ala. Ct. App. 1993).

616 So. 2d 366 (Craig v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Adams v. State
907 So. 2d 1079 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama, 2005)