Craig v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama

Craig v. State

616 So. 2d 366, 1993 Ala. Crim. App. LEXIS 282, 1993 WL 85946

CourtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama

DecidedMarch 26, 1993

DocketCR-91-785

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 616 So. 2d 366 (Craig v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Craig v. State, 616 So. 2d 366, 1993 Ala. Crim. App. LEXIS 282, 1993 WL 85946 (Ala. Ct. App. 1993).

Pincite

Opinion

On Return to Remand

McMILLAN, Judge.

We remanded this cause, 616 So.2d 364, for the trial court to properly sentence the appellant on his conviction of robbery in the third degree. The trial court has now filed its return, which states that the appellant has been resentenced to 10 years' imprisonment, that sentence to run concurrently with the sentence imposed on his conviction of robbery in the first degree. Because the sentence is now within the range prescribed for a Class C felony conviction when the defendant has a single prior felony conviction, the judgment of the [367]*367trial court is due to be, and it is hereby, affirmed.

AFFIRMED.

All Judges concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

On Return to Remand

McMILLAN, Judge.

We remanded this cause, 616 So.2d 364, for the trial court to properly sentence the appellant on his conviction of robbery in the third degree. The trial court has now filed its return, which states that the appellant has been resentenced to 10 years' imprisonment, that sentence to run concurrently with the sentence imposed on his conviction of robbery in the first degree. Because the sentence is now within the range prescribed for a Class C felony conviction when the defendant has a single prior felony conviction, the judgment of the [367]*367trial court is due to be, and it is hereby, affirmed.

AFFIRMED.

All Judges concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

616 So. 2d 366, 1993 Ala. Crim. App. LEXIS 282, 1993 WL 85946, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/craig-v-state-alacrimapp-1993.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack