Craig v. Southern Railway Co.

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Craig v. Southern Railway Co.

138 S.E.2d 35, 262 N.C. 538, 1964 N.C. LEXIS 678

CourtSupreme Court of North Carolina

DecidedSeptember 30, 1964

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 138 S.E.2d 35 (Craig v. Southern Railway Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Craig v. Southern Railway Co., 138 S.E.2d 35, 262 N.C. 538, 1964 N.C. LEXIS 678 (N.C. 1964).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CüRiam.

This appeal, as the parties have stipulated, presents: one question: Did the deed from Oliver W. Davis convey the fee to Atlanta & Richmond Airline Railway Company or merely an easement for railway purposes? The answer is found in the opinion in McCotter v. Barnes, 247 N.C. 480, 101 S.E. 2d 330, which fully discusses all the problems involved here. The Davis deed conveyed a fee simple to the grantee.

The judgment below is

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CüRiam.

This appeal, as the parties have stipulated, presents: one question: Did the deed from Oliver W. Davis convey the fee to Atlanta & Richmond Airline Railway Company or merely an easement for railway purposes? The answer is found in the opinion in McCotter v. Barnes, 247 N.C. 480, 101 S.E. 2d 330, which fully discusses all the problems involved here. The Davis deed conveyed a fee simple to the grantee.

The judgment below is

Affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

138 S.E.2d 35, 262 N.C. 538, 1964 N.C. LEXIS 678, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/craig-v-southern-railway-co-nc-1964.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack