Craig v. Robinson

Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

Craig v. Robinson

33 Misc. 779, 67 N.Y.S. 969

CourtAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

DecidedJanuary 15, 1901

StatusPublished

This text of 33 Misc. 779 (Craig v. Robinson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Craig v. Robinson, 33 Misc. 779, 67 N.Y.S. 969 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1901).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

It is not disputed that the defendant owes the plaintiff seventeen dollars and eighty-five cents. Indeed, the answer admits an indebtedness to this extent, and alleges a tender of the amount. The plea of tender is not, however, available to defendant as a defense because it does not appear that the tender was kept good. The plaintiff was clearly entitled, therefore, to recover at least the amount named, with interest. As there must be a new trial it is not necessary to pass upon any other question in the case further than to remark that the evidence would, in our opinion, have justified an even larger recovery.

Present: Tbttax, P. J., Scott and Dttgbo, JJ.

Judgment reversed and new trial granted, with costs to appellant to abide event.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

It is not disputed that the defendant owes the plaintiff seventeen dollars and eighty-five cents. Indeed, the answer admits an indebtedness to this extent, and alleges a tender of the amount. The plea of tender is not, however, available to defendant as a defense because it does not appear that the tender was kept good. The plaintiff was clearly entitled, therefore, to recover at least the amount named, with interest. As there must be a new trial it is not necessary to pass upon any other question in the case further than to remark that the evidence would, in our opinion, have justified an even larger recovery.

Present: Tbttax, P. J., Scott and Dttgbo, JJ.

Judgment reversed and new trial granted, with costs to appellant to abide event.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

33 Misc. 779, 67 N.Y.S. 969, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/craig-v-robinson-nyappterm-1901.