Craig v. Preston
This text of 593 So. 2d 578 (Craig v. Preston) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Ray C. CRAIG, Petitioner,
v.
Lynette N. PRESTON, et al., Respondents.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
Ira Pozen and Jay M. Levy, Miami, for petitioner.
No appearance for respondents.
Before BASKIN, JORGENSON and LEVY, JJ.
PER CURIAM.
Ray C. Craig petitions for a writ of common law certiorari seeking review of a clerk's order dismissing his appeal from the appellate division of the circuit court for failure to timely file his initial brief.
We grant the petition, as "[i]t is an established principle of law that dismissal of an appellate proceeding should be employed sparingly and only after repeated violations or contumacious disregard of a court's orders." Krebs v. State, 588 So.2d 38 (Fla. 5th DCA 1991) (citations omitted). The order that established the briefing schedule was ambiguous because it was subject to various interpretations. Pursuant to our reading of the order, appellant's brief was timely filed.
Accordingly, we grant the petition, quash the order under review, and remand for reinstatement of the appeal.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
593 So. 2d 578, 1992 WL 16607, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/craig-v-preston-fladistctapp-1992.