Craig v. Pellet

Appellate Court of Illinois

Craig v. Pellet

209 Ill. App. 368

CourtAppellate Court of Illinois

DecidedJanuary 30, 1918

DocketGen. No. 23,276

StatusPublished

Cited by3 cases

This text of 209 Ill. App. 368 (Craig v. Pellet) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Court of Illinois primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Craig v. Pellet, 209 Ill. App. 368 (Ill. Ct. App. 1918).

Pincite

Opinion

Mr. Justice O’Connor

delivered the opinion of the court.

5. Sales, § 252*—when no implied warranty as to fitness for purpose prior to Uniform Sales Act. Prior to the Uniform Sales Act of 1915 [Callaghan’s 1916 St. Supp. ¶ 1021(4) et seq.J, where the purchaser of a specified appliance did not rely on the judgment or skill of the seller hut was as familiar with the appliance as the seller, there was no implied warranty by the seller that the appliance was reasonably fit for the purpose for which it was bought.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Mr. Justice O’Connor

delivered the opinion of the court.

5. Sales, § 252*—when no implied warranty as to fitness for purpose prior to Uniform Sales Act. Prior to the Uniform Sales Act of 1915 [Callaghan’s 1916 St. Supp. ¶ 1021(4) et seq.J, where the purchaser of a specified appliance did not rely on the judgment or skill of the seller hut was as familiar with the appliance as the seller, there was no implied warranty by the seller that the appliance was reasonably fit for the purpose for which it was bought.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

209 Ill. App. 368, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/craig-v-pellet-illappct-1918.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack