Craig v. Peake
This text of 22 Ill. 185 (Craig v. Peake) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Illinois Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
This case should have been submitted to the jury. There was evidence, to say the least, tending strongly to show that the property belonged to the claimant, and he had a right to take the opinion of the jury upon the evidence as to whether it was not his property. Independent of all other evidence, the property was .found in his possession, claiming title, and this was of itself sufficient to put the case to the jury. The court erred in instructing the jury to find as they did, and the judgment must be reversed and the cause remanded.
Judgment reversed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
22 Ill. 185, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/craig-v-peake-ill-1859.