Craig v. New York World Telegram Corp.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Craig v. New York World Telegram Corp.

259 A.D. 1003, 21 N.Y.S.2d 22

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJune 19, 1940

StatusPublished

This text of 259 A.D. 1003 (Craig v. New York World Telegram Corp.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Craig v. New York World Telegram Corp., 259 A.D. 1003, 21 N.Y.S.2d 22 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1940).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

We think the first cause of action, as pleaded, is sufficient upon its face and should not have been dismissed. The order, accordingly, should be modified by denying the motion to dismiss the complaint as to the first cause of action, and as so modified affirmed, without costs, with leave to plaintiff to serve an amended complaint as to the second and third causes of action within ten days from the service of a copy of the order, with notice of entry thereof.

Present — Martin, P. J., O’Malley, Townley, Cohn and Callahan, JJ.

Order unanimously modified by denying the motion to dismiss the complaint as to the first cause of action, and as so modified affirmed, without costs, with leave to the plaintiff to serve an amended complaint as to the second and third causes of action within ten days after service of order.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

We think the first cause of action, as pleaded, is sufficient upon its face and should not have been dismissed. The order, accordingly, should be modified by denying the motion to dismiss the complaint as to the first cause of action, and as so modified affirmed, without costs, with leave to plaintiff to serve an amended complaint as to the second and third causes of action within ten days from the service of a copy of the order, with notice of entry thereof.

Present — Martin, P. J., O’Malley, Townley, Cohn and Callahan, JJ.

Order unanimously modified by denying the motion to dismiss the complaint as to the first cause of action, and as so modified affirmed, without costs, with leave to the plaintiff to serve an amended complaint as to the second and third causes of action within ten days after service of order.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

259 A.D. 1003, 21 N.Y.S.2d 22, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/craig-v-new-york-world-telegram-corp-nyappdiv-1940.