Craig v. Klein

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Craig v. Klein

8 A.D.3d 55, 777 N.Y.S.2d 646, 2004 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7841

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJune 8, 2004

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 8 A.D.3d 55 (Craig v. Klein) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Craig v. Klein, 8 A.D.3d 55, 777 N.Y.S.2d 646, 2004 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7841 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2004).

Pincite

Opinion

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Debra A. James, J.), entered February 24, 2004, which, to the extent appealed from, limited defendant judgment debtor’s installment payments to $2,368 per month, toward satisfaction of a $400,000 judgment, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

Less than half of defendant’s claimed monthly living expenses—for food, utilities, entertainment and miscellaneous—were allowed as reasonable and necessary (CPLR 5226), and the court providently exercised its discretion in crediting the wife’s justification for a Manhattan rental. This determination was amply supported in the record. Concur—Tom, J.P., Mazzarelli, Andrias, Ellerin and Lerner, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Debra A. James, J.), entered February 24, 2004, which, to the extent appealed from, limited defendant judgment debtor’s installment payments to $2,368 per month, toward satisfaction of a $400,000 judgment, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

Less than half of defendant’s claimed monthly living expenses—for food, utilities, entertainment and miscellaneous—were allowed as reasonable and necessary (CPLR 5226), and the court providently exercised its discretion in crediting the wife’s justification for a Manhattan rental. This determination was amply supported in the record. Concur—Tom, J.P., Mazzarelli, Andrias, Ellerin and Lerner, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

8 A.D.3d 55, 777 N.Y.S.2d 646, 2004 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7841, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/craig-v-klein-nyappdiv-2004.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack