Craig v. Kenneth Cole Productions (Lic), Inc.
This text of Craig v. Kenneth Cole Productions (Lic), Inc. (Craig v. Kenneth Cole Productions (Lic), Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.
United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ______________________
ANDREW CRAIG, Appellant,
v.
KENNETH COLE PRODUCTIONS (LIC), INC. Appellee.
____________________
2011-1028 ______________________
Appeal from the United States Patent and Trademark Office, Trademark Trial and Appeal Board in Opposition No. 91161781. ______________________
JUDGMENT ______________________
MARK D. SCHNEIDER, Gifford, Krass, Sprinkle, Anderson & Citkowski, P.C., of Troy, Michigan, argued for appellant. With him on the brief was ERNEST I. GIFFORD.
CATHY E. SHORE-SIROTIN, Lackenbach Siegel, LLP, of Scarsdale, New York, argued for appellee. With her on the brief was HOWARD N. ARONSON. ______________________ THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is
ORDERED and ADJUDGED:
PER CURIAM (BRYSON, DYK, and O’MALLEY, Circuit Judges).
AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.
ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT
June 9, 2011 /s/ Jan Horbaly Date Jan Horbaly Clerk
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Craig v. Kenneth Cole Productions (Lic), Inc., Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/craig-v-kenneth-cole-productions-lic-inc-cafc-2011.