Craig v. Hickok Music Company, Inc.

New York Court of Appeals

Craig v. Hickok Music Company, Inc.

170 N.E. 164, 252 N.Y. 614, 1930 N.Y. LEXIS 678

New York Court of Appeals·Decided January 14, 1930·Published

Opinion

Judgment of the Appellate Division reversed and that of the Trial Term affirmed, with costs in this court and in the Appellate Division, on the ground that it was error for the Appellate Division to reverse the judgment upon the law alone as the evidence presented questions of fact which were properly submitted to the jury.

Concur: Cardozo, Ch. J., Pound, Kellogg and Hubbs, JJ. Dissenting: Crane, Lehman and O’Brien, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Judgment of the Appellate Division reversed and that of the Trial Term affirmed, with costs in this court and in the Appellate Division, on the ground that it was error for the Appellate Division to reverse the judgment upon the law alone as the evidence presented questions of fact which were properly submitted to the jury.

Concur: Cardozo, Ch. J., Pound, Kellogg and Hubbs, JJ. Dissenting: Crane, Lehman and O’Brien, JJ.

Craig v. Hickok Music Company, Inc., 170 N.E. 164, 252 N.Y. 614, 1930 N.Y. LEXIS 678 (N.Y. 1930).

Pincite

170 N.E. 164 (Craig v. Hickok Music Company, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.