Craig v. Hickok Music Company, Inc.

New York Court of Appeals

Craig v. Hickok Music Company, Inc.

170 N.E. 164, 252 N.Y. 614, 1930 N.Y. LEXIS 678

DecidedJanuary 14, 1930

StatusPublished

This text of 170 N.E. 164 (Craig v. Hickok Music Company, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Craig v. Hickok Music Company, Inc., 170 N.E. 164, 252 N.Y. 614, 1930 N.Y. LEXIS 678 (N.Y. 1930).

Pincite

Opinion

Judgment of the Appellate Division reversed and that of the Trial Term affirmed, with costs in this court and in the Appellate Division, on the ground that it was error for the Appellate Division to reverse the judgment upon the law alone as the evidence presented questions of fact which were properly submitted to the jury.

Concur: Cardozo, Ch. J., Pound, Kellogg and Hubbs, JJ. Dissenting: Crane, Lehman and O’Brien, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Judgment of the Appellate Division reversed and that of the Trial Term affirmed, with costs in this court and in the Appellate Division, on the ground that it was error for the Appellate Division to reverse the judgment upon the law alone as the evidence presented questions of fact which were properly submitted to the jury.

Concur: Cardozo, Ch. J., Pound, Kellogg and Hubbs, JJ. Dissenting: Crane, Lehman and O’Brien, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

170 N.E. 164, 252 N.Y. 614, 1930 N.Y. LEXIS 678, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/craig-v-hickok-music-company-inc-ny-1930.