Craig v. Greer, Sheriff

1912 OK 342, 124 P. 1096, 33 Okla. 302, 1912 Okla. LEXIS 688
Supreme Court of Oklahoma·Decided May 14, 1912·No. 3843·Published·Cited by 6 cases

Opinion

WILLIAMS, J.

This proceeding in error is to review the order of the lower court dissolving a temporary injunction. No case-made is attached to the petition in error. .

A motion to dismiss has been filed upon such ground; the contention being that the error sought to be reviewed cannot be brought before this court on a transcript.

*303 The proceeding in error must be dismissed. Green et al. v. Incorporated Town of Yeager, 23 Okla. 128, 99 Pac. 906; Lamb et al. v. Young et al., 24 Okla. 614, 104 Pac. 335; Nelson et al. v. Glenn et al., 28 Okla. 575, 115 Pac. 471; Tribal Development Co. et al. v. White Bros. et al., 28 Okla. 525, 114 Pac. 736; Richardson et al. v. Beidleman, post, 126 Pac. 816-818.

TURNER, C. J., and HAYES, KANE, and DUNN, JJ„ concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Craig v. Greer, Sheriff, 1912 OK 342, 124 P. 1096, 33 Okla. 302, 1912 Okla. LEXIS 688 (Okla. 1912).

1912 OK 342 (Craig v. Greer, Sheriff) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State Ex Rel. Pitman v. Fidelity Bldg. & Loan Ass'n
1928 OK 591 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1928)
Holloway v. O'Dell
1928 OK 337 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1928)
Scott v. Woods Lumber Co.
1922 OK 195 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1922)
Maness v. Wilson
1916 OK 609 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1916)
Brown-Beane Co. v. Rucker
1913 OK 47 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1913)
Richardson Et Vir v. Beidleman
126 P. 818 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1912)