Craig v. Gree USA, Inc.
Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION
Gavin Craig, et al., Case No. 3:24-cv-846
Plaintiffs,
v. ORDER
Gree U.S.A., Inc., et al.,
Defendants.
In accordance with the parties’ stipulation, (Doc. No. 36), the Second Cause of Action (Fraud) in Plaintiffs’ Second Amended Complaint (the “Fraud Claim”), (see Doc. No. 30), is dismissed with prejudice under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 21. See, e.g., Bernard v. City of Cleveland, No. 1:21-CV-1103, 2022 WL 4367655, at *1 (N.D. Ohio Sept. 21, 2022) (finding Rule 21 the proper procedural vehicle to voluntarily dismiss less than an entire action). The pending motions related to this matter are denied as moot. (Doc. Nos. 31 and 32). By August 14, 2025, counsel shall submit a joint status report proposing next steps in this case. This report may be filed on the public docket or emailed to my chambers at helmick_chambers@ohnd.uscourts.gov.
So Ordered.
s/ Jeffrey J. Helmick United States District Judge
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Craig v. Gree USA, Inc. (Craig v. Gree USA, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.