Craig v. Glass

Indiana Supreme Court

Craig v. Glass

1 Smith & H. 27

DecidedMay 15, 1848

StatusPublished

This text of 1 Smith & H. 27 (Craig v. Glass) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Indiana Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Craig v. Glass, 1 Smith & H. 27 (Ind. 1848).

Pincite

Opinion

Held, that to authorise the rendition of a judgment by cognovit, there must be an appearance by the defendant; and such appearance must be made by the defendant in person or by his attorney at law duly authorised; and that an agreement in writing, made out of court, authorising the clerk of the court to enter up a judgment, will not authorise such judgment where there has been no appearance by the defendant.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Held, that to authorise the rendition of a judgment by cognovit, there must be an appearance by the defendant; and such appearance must be made by the defendant in person or by his attorney at law duly authorised; and that an agreement in writing, made out of court, authorising the clerk of the court to enter up a judgment, will not authorise such judgment where there has been no appearance by the defendant.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

1 Smith & H. 27, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/craig-v-glass-ind-1848.