Craig v. Craig

5 Va. 419, 1 Call 483, 1799 Va. LEXIS 5
CourtCourt of Appeals of Virginia
DecidedApril 11, 1799
StatusPublished
Cited by6 cases

This text of 5 Va. 419 (Craig v. Craig) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Virginia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Craig v. Craig, 5 Va. 419, 1 Call 483, 1799 Va. LEXIS 5 (Va. Ct. App. 1799).

Opinion

PENDLETON, President.

Then- you suppose the words payment of money, in the act, to relate to the condition of the bond?

Wickham, yes.

PEE C TJE.

The judgment must be reversed; because “the bond on which the suit is brought, not being for the payment of money or tobacco, but with a condition for performance of covenants, was not, by law, assignable at the time the suit was commenced; which was, therefore, not maintainable by the assignee. ”

Judgment reversed, with costs; and judgment entered for the defendant.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Waterman v. Frank
21 Mo. 108 (Supreme Court of Missouri, 1855)
Ragsdale v. Hagy
9 Gratt. 409 (Supreme Court of Virginia, 1852)
Wilson v. McElroy
10 Miss. 241 (Mississippi Supreme Court, 1844)
Gallego v. Quesnall's Administrator
1 Va. 205 (Virginia Chancery Court, 1806)
Gallego v. Quesnall's Administrator
1 Va. 205 (New York Court of Chancery, 1806)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
5 Va. 419, 1 Call 483, 1799 Va. LEXIS 5, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/craig-v-craig-vactapp-1799.