Craig v. Craig
This text of 5 Va. 419 (Craig v. Craig) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Virginia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Then- you suppose the words payment of money, in the act, to relate to the condition of the bond?
Wickham, yes.
The judgment must be reversed; because “the bond on which the suit is brought, not being for the payment of money or tobacco, but with a condition for performance of covenants, was not, by law, assignable at the time the suit was commenced; which was, therefore, not maintainable by the assignee. ”
Judgment reversed, with costs; and judgment entered for the defendant.
[* Henderson v. Hepburn, 2 Call, 232; Lewis v. Harwood, 6 Cran. 82; and Meredith’s adm’x. v. Duval, 1 Munf. 76.]
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
5 Va. 419, 1 Call 483, 1799 Va. LEXIS 5, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/craig-v-craig-vactapp-1799.