Craig v. Craig

5 Va. 419, 1 Call 483, 1799 Va. LEXIS 5
Court of Appeals of Virginia·Decided April 11, 1799·Published·Cited by 6 cases

Opinion

PENDLETON, President.

Then- you suppose the words payment of money, in the act, to relate to the condition of the bond?

Wickham, yes.

PEE C TJE.

The judgment must be reversed; because “the bond on which the suit is brought, not being for the payment of money or tobacco, but with a condition for performance of covenants, was not, by law, assignable at the time the suit was commenced; which was, therefore, not maintainable by the assignee. ”

Judgment reversed, with costs; and judgment entered for the defendant.

Footnotes

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Craig v. Craig, 5 Va. 419, 1 Call 483, 1799 Va. LEXIS 5 (Va. Ct. App. 1799).

5 Va. 419 (Craig v. Craig) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Waterman v. Frank
21 Mo. 108 (Supreme Court of Missouri, 1855)
Ragsdale v. Hagy
9 Gratt. 409 (Supreme Court of Virginia, 1852)
Wilson v. McElroy
10 Miss. 241 (Mississippi Supreme Court, 1844)
Gallego v. Quesnall's Administrator
1 Va. 205 (Virginia Chancery Court, 1806)
Gallego v. Quesnall's Administrator
1 Va. 205 (New York Court of Chancery, 1806)