Craig v. Craig
This text of 8 Sadler 357 (Craig v. Craig) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
John B. Craig certainly occupied the land in dispute long ■enough to perfect his title by the statute of limitations, and though the parol gift from his father may not have been good itself, yet it was evidence to sIioav how he entered, not as a tenant at will, but under claim of right and adverse to all others. So, the boundaries, though not distinctly marked on the ground, Avere nevertheless so designated that they could be readily ascertained; hence, the maxim properly applies that that is to be treated as certain which can be rendered certain.
The judgment is affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
8 Sadler 357, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/craig-v-craig-pa-1887.