Craig v. Craig

Supreme Court of Georgia

Craig v. Craig

244 S.E.2d 13, 241 Ga. 187, 1978 Ga. LEXIS 917

Supreme Court of Georgia·Decided April 5, 1978·No. 33339·Published

Opinion

Undercofler, Presiding Justice.

In this appeal from a temporary alimony order, the wife claims the trial court abused its discretion in awarding only $250 per month for a three-month period, in reserving decision rather than awarding attorney fees, and in refusing to award a reasonable sum for medical expenses for a minor child, who is not the daughter of the husband. We find no abuse of discretion. Wilbanks v. [188]*188Wilbanks, 238 Ga. 660 (234 SE2d 915) (1977); Goldman v. Goldman, 230 Ga. 245 (196 SE2d 427) (1973).

Argued March 14, 1978 Decided April 5, 1978. Shulmán, Buer, Deitch, Raines & Hester, Warren S. Shulman,GilbertH. Deitch, GeraldB. Kline, for appellant. Paul R. Koehler, for appellee.

Judgment affirmed.

All the Justices concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Undercofler, Presiding Justice.

In this appeal from a temporary alimony order, the wife claims the trial court abused its discretion in awarding only $250 per month for a three-month period, in reserving decision rather than awarding attorney fees, and in refusing to award a reasonable sum for medical expenses for a minor child, who is not the daughter of the husband. We find no abuse of discretion. Wilbanks v. [188]*188Wilbanks, 238 Ga. 660 (234 SE2d 915) (1977); Goldman v. Goldman, 230 Ga. 245 (196 SE2d 427) (1973).

Argued March 14, 1978 Decided April 5, 1978. Shulmán, Buer, Deitch, Raines & Hester, Warren S. Shulman,GilbertH. Deitch, GeraldB. Kline, for appellant. Paul R. Koehler, for appellee.

Judgment affirmed.

All the Justices concur.

Craig v. Craig, 244 S.E.2d 13, 241 Ga. 187, 1978 Ga. LEXIS 917 (Ga. 1978).

Pincite

244 S.E.2d 13 (Craig v. Craig) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related