Craig v. Craig
This text of 244 S.E.2d 13 (Craig v. Craig) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
In this appeal from a temporary alimony order, the wife claims the trial court abused its discretion in awarding only $250 per month for a three-month period, in reserving decision rather than awarding attorney fees, and in refusing to award a reasonable sum for medical expenses for a minor child, who is not the daughter of the husband. We find no abuse of discretion. Wilbanks v. [188]*188Wilbanks, 238 Ga. 660 (234 SE2d 915) (1977); Goldman v. Goldman, 230 Ga. 245 (196 SE2d 427) (1973).
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
244 S.E.2d 13, 241 Ga. 187, 1978 Ga. LEXIS 917, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/craig-v-craig-ga-1978.