Craig Thorner v. Sony Computer Entertainment
This text of Craig Thorner v. Sony Computer Entertainment (Craig Thorner v. Sony Computer Entertainment) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Case: 13-1329 Document: 14 Page: 1 Filed: 05/28/2013
NOTE: This order is nonprecedential.
United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit __________________________
CRAIG THORNER AND VIRTUAL REALITY FEEDBACK CORPORATION, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. SONY COMPUTER ENTERTAINMENT AMERICA, LLC, SONY ELECTRONICS, INC. AND RILEY RUSSELL, Defendants-Appellees, AND
GREGORY S. GEWIRTZ AND LERNER DAVID LITTENBERG KRUMHOLZ & MENTLIK, LLP, Defendants-Appellees, AND
LARRY C. RUSS, MARC A. FENSTER, AND RUSS AUGUST & KABAT, Defendants-Appellees, AND
GLEN M. DIEHL AND DIEHL SERVILLA, LLC, Third Party Defendants-Appellees. __________________________
2013-1329 __________________________ Case: 13-1329 Document: 14 Page: 2 Filed: 05/28/2013
CRAIG THORNER v. SONY COMPUTER ENTERTAINMENT 2
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of New Jersey in No. 09-CV-1894, Judge Mary L. Cooper. __________________________
ON MOTION __________________________
ORDER Donald P. Jacobs moves to withdraw as counsel for Craig Thorner and Virtual Reality Feedback Corporation. Federal Circuit Rule 47.3(a) allows an individual to represent himself or herself, but prohibits a corporation, partnership, organization, or other legal entity from doing so. See Int’l Inst. for Fundamental Studies, Inc. v. United States, 222 Ct. Cl. 626, 630-31 (1980). Upon consideration thereof, It Is Ordered That: (1) The motion is granted. (2) New counsel for Virtual Reality Feedback Corpo- ration shall file an entry of appearance within 60 days of the date of this order. Craig Thorner must either apply to appeal pro se or have new counsel file an entry of appear- ance within 60 days of the date of this order. Failure to do so will result in dismissal of the appeal. (3) The appellants' opening brief is due within 120 days of the date of this order.
FOR THE COURT
/s/ Jan Horbaly Jan Horbaly Clerk s26
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Craig Thorner v. Sony Computer Entertainment, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/craig-thorner-v-sony-computer-entertainment-cafc-2013.