Craig Smith v. Carolyn W. Colvin
This text of 612 F. App'x 405 (Craig Smith v. Carolyn W. Colvin) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Craig Morgan Smith appeals the district court’s 1 order affirming the denial of supplemental security income. For reversal, Smith argues that the Administrative Law Judge (ALJ) erred in finding that Smith failed to show current deficits of adaptive functioning as required by Listing 12.05C to meet the listed impairment for intellectual disability. See 20 C.F.R. Pt. 404, subpt. P, app. 1 § 12.05C. Following careful review of the parties’ submissions and the record before us, we conclude that substantial evidence in the record as a whole supports the ALJ’s finding. See Phillips v. Colvin, 721 F.3d 623, 625 (8th Cir.2013) (standard of review). Accordingly, the judgment of the district court is affirmed. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
612 F. App'x 405, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/craig-smith-v-carolyn-w-colvin-ca8-2015.