Craig Smith v. Carolyn W. Colvin

612 F. App'x 405
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit·Decided August 10, 2015·No. 14-3806·Unpublished

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Craig Morgan Smith appeals the district court’s 1 order affirming the denial of supplemental security income. For reversal, Smith argues that the Administrative Law Judge (ALJ) erred in finding that Smith failed to show current deficits of adaptive functioning as required by Listing 12.05C to meet the listed impairment for intellectual disability. See 20 C.F.R. Pt. 404, subpt. P, app. 1 § 12.05C. Following careful review of the parties’ submissions and the record before us, we conclude that substantial evidence in the record as a whole supports the ALJ’s finding. See Phillips v. Colvin, 721 F.3d 623, 625 (8th Cir.2013) (standard of review). Accordingly, the judgment of the district court is affirmed. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.

1

. The Honorable Sarah W. Hays, United States Magistrate Judge for the Western District of Missouri, to whom the case was referred for final disposition by consent of the parties pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(c).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Craig Smith v. Carolyn W. Colvin, 612 F. App'x 405 (8th Cir. 2015).

612 F. App'x 405 (Craig Smith v. Carolyn W. Colvin) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Gary Phillips v. Carolyn W. Colvin
721 F.3d 623 (Eighth Circuit, 2013)