CRAIG S. BARTEE v. STATE OF FLORIDA
Opinion
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FOURTH DISTRICT
CRAIG SENTELL BARTEE, Appellant,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellee.
No. 4D19-1193
[July 3, 2019]
Appeal of order denying rule 3.850 motion from the Circuit Court for the Nineteenth Judicial Circuit, Indian River County; Dan L. Vaughn, Judge; L.T. Case No. 312011CF000377A.
Craig Sentell Bartee, Indiantown, pro se.
No appearance required for appellee.
PER CURIAM.
Affirmed.
WARNER, CIKLIN and KUNTZ, JJ., concur.
* * *
Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
CRAIG S. BARTEE v. STATE OF FLORIDA (CRAIG S. BARTEE v. STATE OF FLORIDA) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.