Craig Reed v. the State of Texas
Opinion
In The Court of Appeals Seventh District of Texas at Amarillo
No. 07-25-00108-CR
CRAIG REED, APPELLANT
V.
THE STATE OF TEXAS, APPELLEE
On Appeal from the 108th District Court Potter County, Texas Trial Court No. 080013-E-CR, Honorable Timothy G. Pirtle, Presiding
April 11, 2025 MEMORANDUM OPINION Before QUINN, C.J., and DOSS and YARBROUGH, JJ.
Appellant, Craig Reed, was convicted of possession of a controlled substance1
and sentenced, pursuant to a plea bargain agreement, to eight years of confinement. The
trial court’s certification of Appellant’s right of appeal reflects that this is a plea bargain
case from which Appellant has no right of appeal and that Appellant has waived the right
1 See TEX. HEALTH & SAFETY CODE ANN. § 481.115(b). of appeal. The certification comports with the record before the Court. Notwithstanding
the certification, Appellant filed a notice of appeal, pro se, challenging his conviction.
We are required by Rule of Appellate Procedure 25.2(d) to dismiss an appeal “if a
certification that shows the defendant has the right of appeal has not been made part of
the record.” By letter of March 25, 2025, we notified Appellant of the consequences of
the trial court’s certification and directed him to show grounds for continuing the appeal.
Appellant filed a response but has failed to demonstrate a right to appeal his conviction.
Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal based on the trial court’s certification. See
TEX. R. APP. P. 25.2(d).
Do not publish.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Craig Reed v. the State of Texas (Craig Reed v. the State of Texas) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.