Craig (ID 122774) v. Geary County Detention Center

CourtDistrict Court, D. Kansas
DecidedFebruary 5, 2020
Docket5:19-cv-03149
StatusUnknown

This text of Craig (ID 122774) v. Geary County Detention Center (Craig (ID 122774) v. Geary County Detention Center) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, D. Kansas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Craig (ID 122774) v. Geary County Detention Center, (D. Kan. 2020).

Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF KANSAS

DALTON JOHN CRAIG,

Plaintiff,

v. CASE NO. 19-3149-SAC

GEARY COUNTY DETENTION CENTER, et al.,

Defendants.

O R D E R

Plaintiff Dalton John Craig is an inmate at the Lansing Correctional Facility in Lansing, Kansas. Plaintiff filed this pro se § 1983 action against the Geary County Detention Center and Geary County Sheriff’s Office. He is proceeding in forma pauperis. On January 6, 2020, Mr. Craig submitted a letter stating he no longer wants to proceed with his case and asking to have the automatic payments toward the filing fee stopped. Plaintiff states he earns very little and even the small amount that goes toward the filing fee has made it difficult for him to stay in contact with his loved ones. Plaintiff further requests a refund of the amounts he has already paid toward the filing fee. The Court construes the January 6 letter liberally as a notice of voluntary dismissal pursuant to Rule 41(a)(1) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Rule 41(a)(1) provides that “the plaintiff may dismiss an action without a court order by filing (i) a notice of dismissal before the opposing party serves either an answer or a motion for summary judgment.” No response has been filed by the defendant in this action. A voluntary dismissal pursuant to Rule 41(a)(1) is effective immediately upon the filing of a written notice of dismissal, and no subsequent court order is necessary. See Hyde Constr. Co. v. Koehring Co., 388 F.2d 501, 507 (10th Cir. 1968). The notice closes the file. See id. IT IS THEREFORE BY THE COURT ORDERED that the motion filed by Plaintiff on

January 6, 2020 (ECF No. 5) is granted and is construed as a notice of voluntary dismissal pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1). The voluntary dismissal is effective as of January 6, 2020, the date the liberally construed notice of dismissal was filed in this action. This action is dismissed without prejudice. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the portion of the Court’s order (ECF No. 3) requiring Plaintiff to make monthly payments of 20 percent of the preceding month’s income toward the $350.00 filing fee is rescinded going forward. No refund shall be paid to Plaintiff. The clerk of the court shall transmit a copy of this order to the finance office at Lansing Correctional Facility. IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated in Topeka, Kansas, on this 5th day of February, 2020.

s/_Sam A. Crow_____ SAM A. CROW U. S. Senior District Judge

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Hyde Construction Company, Inc. v. Koehring Company
388 F.2d 501 (Tenth Circuit, 1968)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Craig (ID 122774) v. Geary County Detention Center, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/craig-id-122774-v-geary-county-detention-center-ksd-2020.