Craig & Giers v. Musgrave

Baltimore City Circuit Court

Craig & Giers v. Musgrave

1 Balt. C. Rep. 230

DecidedOctober 30, 1891

StatusPublished

This text of 1 Balt. C. Rep. 230 (Craig & Giers v. Musgrave) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Baltimore City Circuit Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Craig & Giers v. Musgrave, 1 Balt. C. Rep. 230 (Md. Super. Ct. 1891).

Pincite

Opinion

PHELPS, J.

Administrators de bonis non have no right to proceed in a court of equity for the recovery of money belonging to the estate of the intestate and in the hands of the first administrator at the time of his death, without first obtaining an order from the Orphans’ Court. Johnson vs. Bank, 11 Md. 412. The absence of any averments that- this essential preliminary has been complied with, is alone fatal to the bill, upon demurrer, without considering other grounds, arid the demurrer must therefore be sustained.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PHELPS, J.

Administrators de bonis non have no right to proceed in a court of equity for the recovery of money belonging to the estate of the intestate and in the hands of the first administrator at the time of his death, without first obtaining an order from the Orphans’ Court. Johnson vs. Bank, 11 Md. 412. The absence of any averments that- this essential preliminary has been complied with, is alone fatal to the bill, upon demurrer, without considering other grounds, arid the demurrer must therefore be sustained.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

1 Balt. C. Rep. 230, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/craig-giers-v-musgrave-mdcirctctbalt-1891.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack