Craig Fontaine v. Hassan Dandachli
This text of Craig Fontaine v. Hassan Dandachli (Craig Fontaine v. Hassan Dandachli) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN
JUDGMENT RENDERED APRIL 29, 2022
NO. 03-22-00229-CV
Craig Fontaine, Appellant
v.
Hassan Dandachli, Appellee
APPEAL FROM THE 395TH DISTRICT COURT OF WILLIAMSON COUNTY BEFORE JUSTICES GOODWIN, BAKER, AND TRIANA DISMISSED ON AGREED MOTION -- OPINION BY JUSTICE BAKER
This is an appeal from the judgment signed by the trial court on January 24, 2022. Appellant has
filed a motion to dismiss the appeal, and having considered the motion, the Court agrees that
the motion should be granted. Therefore, the Court grants the motion and dismisses the appeal.
Appellant shall pay all costs relating to this appeal, both in this Court and in the court below.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Craig Fontaine v. Hassan Dandachli, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/craig-fontaine-v-hassan-dandachli-texapp-2022.