Craig Aslinger v. Amino Transport, Inc.
Opinion
In the Court of Appeals Second Appellate District of Texas at Fort Worth ___________________________ No. 02-20-00196-CV ___________________________
CRAIG ASLINGER, Appellant
V.
AMINO TRANSPORT, INC., Appellee
On Appeal from the 96th District Court Tarrant County, Texas Trial Court No. 096-309811-19
Before Birdwell, Bassel, and Womack, JJ. Per Curiam Memorandum Opinion MEMORANDUM OPINION AND JUDGMENT
On October 15, 2020 and November 3, 2020, we notified appellant that the
trial-court clerk responsible for preparing the record in this appeal has informed us
that appellant has not arranged to pay for the clerk’s record as the appellate rules
require. See Tex. R. App. P. 35.3(a)(2). In our notice, we warned that we would
dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution unless, within ten days, appellant arranged
to pay for the clerk’s record and provided us with proof of payment. See Tex. R. App.
P. 35.3(c), 37.3(b), 44.3.
Because appellant has not made payment arrangements for the clerk’s record,
we now dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution. See Tex. R. App. P. 37.3(b),
42.3(b), 43.2(f).
Appellant must pay all costs of this appeal. See Tex. R. App. P. 43.4.
Per Curiam
Delivered: December 3, 2020
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Craig Aslinger v. Amino Transport, Inc. (Craig Aslinger v. Amino Transport, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.