Craig Anthony Crooks v. State

Opinion

COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIRST DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT HOUSTON

NOTICE OF ORDER ON MOTION

Cause number: 01-12-00996-CR Style: Craig Anthony Crooks v The State of Texas Date motion filed*: March 13, 2013 Type of motion: Motion to substitute attorney of record Party filing motion: Appellant Document to be filed:

Is appeal accelerated? No

If motion to extend time: Original due date: Number of previous extensions Current Due date: granted: Date Requested:

Ordered that motion is:

 Granted If document is to be filed, document due:  Absent extraordinary circumstances, the Court will not grant additional motions to extend time  Denied  Dismissed (e.g., want of jurisdiction, moot)  Other: _____________________________________ In the motion to substitute, counsel fails to certify that appellant, Craig Anthony Crooks, was served with the motion either in person or by both certified and first-class mail. See TEX. R. APP. P. 6.5(b), (d), 9.5(d). The motion as presented is denied.

Judge's signature: Jim Sharp X

Date: May 8, 2013

November 7, 2008 Revision