Cragstan Corp. v. United States
This text of 58 Cust. Ct. 862 (Cragstan Corp. v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Customs Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the items of merchandise marked “A” covered by the foregoing protests consist of bicycle horns similar in all material respects to those the subject of Sherwin International, Inc. v. United States (54 Cust. Ct. 466, Abstract 69382), and that the items of merchandise marked “B” covered by the foregoing protests consist of bicycle horns similar in all material respects to those the subject of G. Joannou Co., Inc. v. United States (46 Cust. Ct. 172, C.D. 2253), the claims of the plaintiffs were sustained.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
58 Cust. Ct. 862, 1967 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 1988, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/cragstan-corp-v-united-states-cusc-1967.