Craftmaster of Brevard, Inc. v. Mead Construction, Inc.

858 So. 2d 1253, 2003 Fla. App. LEXIS 17390, 2003 WL 22681734
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedNovember 14, 2003
DocketNo. 5D03-702
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 858 So. 2d 1253 (Craftmaster of Brevard, Inc. v. Mead Construction, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Craftmaster of Brevard, Inc. v. Mead Construction, Inc., 858 So. 2d 1253, 2003 Fla. App. LEXIS 17390, 2003 WL 22681734 (Fla. Ct. App. 2003).

Opinions

PER CURIAM.

Petitioner, Craftmaster of Brevard, Inc. [“Craftmaster”], seeks review of an interlocutory order of the trial court imposing sanctions in a construction case on Craft-master based on a theory of spoliation of evidence. The sanction imposed was to bar any testimony of observations made by one of Craftmaster’s experts, or corrective work done based on the expert’s recommendations.

A writ of certiorari will not support review of the order at issue because the order, if error, is fully remediable on direct appeal.

PETITION DENIED.

PALMER and ORFINGER, JJ., concur. GRIFFIN, J., concurs and concurs specially, with opinion.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

State v. Fontenot
207 So. 3d 589 (Louisiana Court of Appeal, 2016)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
858 So. 2d 1253, 2003 Fla. App. LEXIS 17390, 2003 WL 22681734, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/craftmaster-of-brevard-inc-v-mead-construction-inc-fladistctapp-2003.