Craft v. State
78 S.E. 776, 13 Ga. App. 79, 1913 Ga. App. LEXIS 44
Opinion
The only evidence that the woman was married consisted of testimony that, about a year before the act took place, she said she was married, and of general statements from witnesses that she had the reputation of being married, having for some time, previous to about a year before the criminal act was alleged to have been committed, lived with a man, who had since left for parts unknown. Under the ruling in the case cited in the headnote, the conviction was not authorized. Judgment reversed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Craft v. State, 78 S.E. 776, 13 Ga. App. 79, 1913 Ga. App. LEXIS 44 (Ga. Ct. App. 1913).
78 S.E. 776 (Craft v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Battle v. State
70 S.E.2d 551 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1952)
Freeman v. State
7 S.E.2d 779 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1940)
Sams v. State
145 N.E. 773 (Indiana Supreme Court, 1924)
State v. Wakefield
228 P. 115 (Oregon Supreme Court, 1924)
Carter v. State
80 S.E. 206 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1913)