Craft v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Craft v. State

23 So. 3d 1255, 2009 Fla. App. LEXIS 20041, 2009 WL 4928309

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedDecember 23, 2009

DocketNo. 3D09-170

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 23 So. 3d 1255 (Craft v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Craft v. State, 23 So. 3d 1255, 2009 Fla. App. LEXIS 20041, 2009 WL 4928309 (Fla. Ct. App. 2009).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Appellant Cedrick Craft’s appeal is dismissed as this Court lacks jurisdiction. Appellant’s motion to rectify the court record is not an appealable order. Additionally, to the extent that Appellant is appealing the January 29, 2008 order denying his Rule 3.850 post-conviction motion through [1256]*1256a filing styled “Motion to Rectify Court Record,” the trial court’s denial of the motion to rectify — even if treated as a motion for rehearing — was not timely filed within 15 days of the trial court’s order denying the Rule 3.850 motion, and, therefore, did not delay rendition of the January 29, 2008 order. See Cole v. State, 905 So.2d 905 (Fla. 1st DCA 2005).

Dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Appellant Cedrick Craft’s appeal is dismissed as this Court lacks jurisdiction. Appellant’s motion to rectify the court record is not an appealable order. Additionally, to the extent that Appellant is appealing the January 29, 2008 order denying his Rule 3.850 post-conviction motion through [1256]*1256a filing styled “Motion to Rectify Court Record,” the trial court’s denial of the motion to rectify — even if treated as a motion for rehearing — was not timely filed within 15 days of the trial court’s order denying the Rule 3.850 motion, and, therefore, did not delay rendition of the January 29, 2008 order. See Cole v. State, 905 So.2d 905 (Fla. 1st DCA 2005).

Dismissed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

23 So. 3d 1255, 2009 Fla. App. LEXIS 20041, 2009 WL 4928309, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/craft-v-state-fladistctapp-2009.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack