Craft v. State

Supreme Court of Florida

Craft v. State

517 So. 2d 691, 13 Fla. L. Weekly 27, 1988 Fla. LEXIS 1, 1988 WL 1519

Supreme Court of Florida·Decided January 7, 1988·No. No. 68421·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We accepted jurisdiction to review State v. Young, 483 So.2d 31 (Fla. 5th DCA 1985), because of apparent conflict with, inter alia, State v. Ducksworth, 408 So.2d 589 (Fla. 2d DCA 1982). However, upon closer examination we do not find the express and direct conflict of decisions required by article V, section 3(b)(3) of the Florida Constitution. Accordingly, we dismiss the petition for review as improvidently granted.

It is so ordered.

MCDONALD, C.J., and OVERTON, EHRLICH, SHAW, BARKETT, GRIMES and KOGAN, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

We accepted jurisdiction to review State v. Young, 483 So.2d 31 (Fla. 5th DCA 1985), because of apparent conflict with, inter alia, State v. Ducksworth, 408 So.2d 589 (Fla. 2d DCA 1982). However, upon closer examination we do not find the express and direct conflict of decisions required by article V, section 3(b)(3) of the Florida Constitution. Accordingly, we dismiss the petition for review as improvidently granted.

It is so ordered.

MCDONALD, C.J., and OVERTON, EHRLICH, SHAW, BARKETT, GRIMES and KOGAN, JJ., concur.

Craft v. State, 517 So. 2d 691, 13 Fla. L. Weekly 27, 1988 Fla. LEXIS 1, 1988 WL 1519 (Fla. 1988).

Pincite

517 So. 2d 691 (Craft v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related