Craft v. Northern Pacific Railroad
35 P. 250, 25 Or. 275, 1894 Ore. LEXIS 14
Opinion
As this case involves the same question decided in Putman v. S. P. Co. 21 Or. 244, we are of the opinion that the right of action given by section 34, Hill’s Code, to a parent or guardian for the injury or death of a child, is confined to minority, and that the view expressed on rehearing in that case should control and be decisive of the present case.
Judgment affirmed. Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Craft v. Northern Pacific Railroad, 35 P. 250, 25 Or. 275, 1894 Ore. LEXIS 14 (Or. 1894).
35 P. 250 (Craft v. Northern Pacific Railroad) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Gillispie v. Beta Construction Co.
842 P.2d 1272 (Alaska Supreme Court, 1992)
Beerbower v. State Ex Rel. Oregon Health Sciences University
736 P.2d 596 (Court of Appeals of Oregon, 1987)
Escobedo v. Ward
464 P.2d 698 (Oregon Supreme Court, 1970)
Schleiger v. Northern Terminal Co.
72 P. 324 (Oregon Supreme Court, 1903)