Craft v. Northern Pacific Railroad
35 P. 250, 25 Or. 275, 1894 Ore. LEXIS 14
This text of 35 P. 250 (Craft v. Northern Pacific Railroad) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Oregon Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Craft v. Northern Pacific Railroad, 35 P. 250, 25 Or. 275, 1894 Ore. LEXIS 14 (Or. 1894).
Opinion
As this case involves the same question decided in Putman v. S. P. Co. 21 Or. 244, we are of the opinion that the right of action given by section 34, Hill’s Code, to a parent or guardian for the injury or death of a child, is confined to minority, and that the view expressed on rehearing in that case should control and be decisive of the present case.
Judgment affirmed. Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Gillispie v. Beta Construction Co.
842 P.2d 1272 (Alaska Supreme Court, 1992)
Beerbower v. State Ex Rel. Oregon Health Sciences University
736 P.2d 596 (Court of Appeals of Oregon, 1987)
Escobedo v. Ward
464 P.2d 698 (Oregon Supreme Court, 1970)
Schleiger v. Northern Terminal Co.
72 P. 324 (Oregon Supreme Court, 1903)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
35 P. 250, 25 Or. 275, 1894 Ore. LEXIS 14, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/craft-v-northern-pacific-railroad-or-1894.