Craft v. Maier
167 A.D.2d 933, 563 N.Y.S.2d 700, 1990 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 14506
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided November 16, 1990·Published
Opinion
Order unanimously affirmed without costs. Memorandum: Supreme Court did not err in denying plaintiffs motion for summary judgment. The questions of credibility on motions for summary judgment pursuant to CPLR 3212 or 3213 should not be resolved by the motion court; such questions should be deferred to the trier of the facts (see, Davis Acoustical Corp. v Matzen Constr., 57 AD2d 1018, 1019). (Appeal from order of Supreme Court, Monroe County, Cornelius, J.—summary judgment.) Present—Dillon, P. J., Doerr, Pine, Lawton and Davis, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Craft v. Maier, 167 A.D.2d 933, 563 N.Y.S.2d 700, 1990 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 14506 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1990).
167 A.D.2d 933 (Craft v. Maier) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Davis Acoustical Corp. v. Matzen Construction, Inc.
57 A.D.2d 1018 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1977)