Craft v. Fleming
This text of 46 Pa. 140 (Craft v. Fleming) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
[144]*144The opinion of the court was delivered, November 5th 1868, by
The learned judge of the court below was of opinion that the endorsement by Fleming was qualified; that is to say, to be read, “ James Fleming, without recourse to me, James Fleming.” The first name was a signature, the second was an effort (tautological) to make it very'clear who it was that was not to be responsible. This was the opinion of the court below, and the learned judge’s reasoning to his conclusion is so clear, that we affirm the judgment on his opinion upon the reserved point.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
46 Pa. 140, 1863 Pa. LEXIS 213, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/craft-v-fleming-pa-1863.