Crae Robert Pease v. State

Court of Appeals of Texas·Decided December 15, 2006·No. 03-06-00369-CR·Published

Opinion

TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

NO. 03-06-00369-CR

Crae Robert Pease, Appellant v.

The State of Texas, Appellee

FROM THE COUNTY COURT AT LAW NO. 7 OF TRAVIS COUNTY NO. 720828, HONORABLE WILLIAM E. BENDER, JUDGE PRESIDING

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Appellant’s brief was due October 30, 2006. The brief has not been received, no extension of time has been requested, and appellant’s retained attorney, Mr. Dal Ray Ruggles, did not respond to this Court’s notice that the brief is overdue.

The appeal is abated. The trial court shall conduct a hearing to determine whether appellant desires to prosecute this appeal, whether appellant is indigent, and, if he is not indigent, whether retained counsel has abandoned this appeal. Tex. R. App. P. 38.8(b)(2). The court shall make appropriate findings and recommendations. A record from this hearing, including copies of

all findings and orders and a transcription of the court reporter’s notes, shall be forwarded to the Clerk of this Court for filing as a supplemental record no later than January 19, 2007. Rule 38.8(b)(3).

Bob Pemberton, Justice

Before Justices B. A. Smith, Pemberton and Waldrop Filed: December 15, 2006 Do Not Publish

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Crae Robert Pease v. State, (Tex. Ct. App. 2006).

Crae Robert Pease v. State (Crae Robert Pease v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.