Craddock v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

Craddock v. State

571 S.W.3d 152

CourtMissouri Court of Appeals

DecidedJanuary 8, 2019

DocketWD 80966

StatusPublished

This text of 571 S.W.3d 152 (Craddock v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Craddock v. State, 571 S.W.3d 152 (Mo. Ct. App. 2019).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam:

Joshua Craddock (Craddock) appeals the judgment of the Circuit Court of Jackson *153County denying his Rule 24.035 motion for post-conviction relief. Craddock alleges that his conviction and sentence based on his guilty plea to one count of assault in the first degree should be vacated due to ineffective assistance of counsel. Because a published opinion would have no precedential value, we have instead provided a memorandum of law to the parties. Finding no error, we affirm. Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam:

Joshua Craddock (Craddock) appeals the judgment of the Circuit Court of Jackson *153County denying his Rule 24.035 motion for post-conviction relief. Craddock alleges that his conviction and sentence based on his guilty plea to one count of assault in the first degree should be vacated due to ineffective assistance of counsel. Because a published opinion would have no precedential value, we have instead provided a memorandum of law to the parties. Finding no error, we affirm. Rule 84.16(b).

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

571 S.W.3d 152, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/craddock-v-state-moctapp-2019.