Craddock v. Gordon

249 A.D. 922, 293 N.Y.S. 503, 1937 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10165

Opinion

Order reversed in so far as it relates to the second cause of action, otherwise affirmed; and motion granted in so far as it relates to the second cause of action to require the plaintiff to separately state and number her alleged cause of action based upon the ownership of preferred stock and her alleged cause of action based upon the ownership of common stock, without costs. All concur. (The order denies motion to compel plaintiff to separately state and number her causes of action in an action to cancel an agreement concerning corporate stock.) Present — Sears, P. J., Edgcomb, Crosby, Lewis and Cunningham, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Craddock v. Gordon, 249 A.D. 922, 293 N.Y.S. 503, 1937 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10165 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1937).

249 A.D. 922 (Craddock v. Gordon) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.