Craddock v. Beaufort County Sheriffs Department

489 F. App'x 712
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
DecidedNovember 26, 2012
DocketNo. 12-1831
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 489 F. App'x 712 (Craddock v. Beaufort County Sheriffs Department) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Craddock v. Beaufort County Sheriffs Department, 489 F. App'x 712 (4th Cir. 2012).

Opinion

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Ronnie Wayne Craddock and Sherrie Denise Hawkins appeal the district court’s order denying relief on their 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Craddock v. Beaufort Cnty. Sheriffs Dep’t, No. 4:09-cv-00092-D, 2011 WL 4460309 (E.D.N.C. Sept. 26, 2011). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

RODGERS v. THE TOWN OF CHINA GROVE
M.D. North Carolina, 2023

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
489 F. App'x 712, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/craddock-v-beaufort-county-sheriffs-department-ca4-2012.