Craddock v. Beaufort County Sheriffs Department

Fourth Circuit

Craddock v. Beaufort County Sheriffs Department

489 F. App'x 712

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided November 26, 2012·No. No. 12-1831·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Ronnie Wayne Craddock and Sherrie Denise Hawkins appeal the district court’s order denying relief on their 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Craddock v. Beaufort Cnty. Sheriffs Dep’t, No. 4:09-cv-00092-D, 2011 WL 4460309 (E.D.N.C. Sept. 26, 2011). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Ronnie Wayne Craddock and Sherrie Denise Hawkins appeal the district court’s order denying relief on their 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Craddock v. Beaufort Cnty. Sheriffs Dep’t, No. 4:09-cv-00092-D, 2011 WL 4460309 (E.D.N.C. Sept. 26, 2011). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Craddock v. Beaufort County Sheriffs Department, 489 F. App'x 712 (4th Cir. 2012).

Pincite

489 F. App'x 712 (Craddock v. Beaufort County Sheriffs Department) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related