Crabtree v. Horton
4 Munf. 59, 18 Va. 59, 1813 Va. LEXIS 16
Opinion
The president pronounced the opinion of this court, that the court below invaded the province of the jury, in relation to the weight of the testimony, and the credibility of the witnesses, in having decided that, in this case, probable cause was proved to exist, at the time the appellee commenced the prosecution in the declaration mentioned, without having the facts, on which such question depended, agreed by the pleadings, or submitted to, the court by the parties or the jury.
Judgment reversed, and new trial awarded,
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Crabtree v. Horton, 4 Munf. 59, 18 Va. 59, 1813 Va. LEXIS 16 (Va. 1813).
4 Munf. 59 (Crabtree v. Horton) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
McVeigh v. Allen
70 Va. 588 (Supreme Court of Virginia, 1877)
Womack v. Circle
70 Va. 192 (Supreme Court of Virginia, 1877)
Miller v. Brown
3 Mo. 127 (Supreme Court of Missouri, 1832)
Stone v. Crocker
41 Mass. 81 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1832)
Masten v. Deyo
2 Wend. 424 (New York Supreme Court, 1829)
Burlingame v. Burlingame
8 Cow. 141 (New York Supreme Court, 1828)
Brooke v. Young
3 Va. 106 (Supreme Court of Virginia, 1824)